In re B.G.M.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1465
Syllabus
Permanent custody; R.C. 2151.353; R.C. 2151.414; best interest; manifest weight. The juvenile court's judgment granting permanent custody of the child to Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services was affirmed. The juvenile court's findings that several R.C. 2151.414(E) factors applied such that the child could not or should not be returned to the parent within a reasonable time were supported by clear and convincing evidence. Additionally, the juvenile court's finding that it was in the child's best interest to be placed in the permanent custody of the agency was supported by clear and convincing evidence. We further conclude that the juvenile court's judgment granting permanent custody to the agency is not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re C.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-20· cited 36×
- In re L.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-13· cited 13×
- In re B.B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-15· cited 12×
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-03· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.