In re B.F.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4238
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., the trial court made best-interest findings, and those findings were not against manifest weight of evidence. The court was permitted to consider reasonable efforts to reunify family as part of its best-interests analysis, and it was not bound by its previous findings. It was within court's discretion what, if any weight, to assign opinions of agency's expert and GAL. The court's judgment denying agency's motion for permanent custody and awarding custody of child to father is affirmed.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
- McKay Machine Co. v. RodmanOhio Supreme Court· 1967-07-05· cited 141×
- In re T.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-17· cited 23×
- In re E.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-15· cited 11×
- In re B.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-11-17· cited 3×
- In re T.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.