In Re Bergeron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It would be hard to argue that the statutory meaning could be any plainer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Maali
  D. Massachusetts· 2010-03-01· cited 3×
• In Re Henson
  N.D. California· 2003-10-23· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• United States v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
  Supreme Court· 1929-01-02· cited 336×
• In Re Pacific Atlantic Trading Co., Debtor. United States of America, Claimant-Appellant v. Robert F. Towers, Trustee-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-08-18· cited 66×
• Seattle-First National Bank v. Conaway
  Ninth Circuit· 1996-10-30· cited 23×
• In Re Zawisza
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-05-27· cited 21×
• In Re Oriole Kjellsen. Terry D. Wieczorek v. Shirley Woldt Oriole Kjellsen
  Eighth Circuit· 1995-06-16· cited 20×
• In Re Murray
  M.D. Tennessee· 1996-07-31· cited 11×
• In re Miller
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1904-12-12· cited 4×