In Re Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[the court] is sim ply not permitted to equitably enlarge the time period for filing proofs of claim absent facts which place Creditors [sic] within one of the express exceptions of Rule 3002”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Windom
  E.D. Tennessee· 2002-09-27· cited 9×
• In Re Gilley
  M.D. Florida· 2002-10-08· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gardenhire v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Gardenhire)
  Ninth Circuit· 1998-04-23· cited 24×
• In Re: Tonya Mae Brown, Eugene and Anita Toivonen, and Doris Ann Berry, Debtors. Internal Revenue Service v. Henry Edward Hildebrand, Iii, Trustee
  Sixth Circuit· 2001-04-09· cited 17×
• In Re Kelley
  E.D. Texas· 2001-01-31· cited 11×
• In Re Elmont Elec. Co., Inc.
  E.D. New York· 1997-03-11· cited 11×
• Internal Revenue Service v. Hildebrand
  M.D. Tennessee· 2000-01-11· cited 10×
• In Re Armstrong
  E.D. Arkansas· 1999-08-19· cited 4×
• In Re Colombraro
  D. New Jersey· 1999-03-03· cited 4×