In Re Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring applicants to show that the new evidence “ ‘undermine[s] the entire prosecution case and point[s] unerringly to innocence or reduced culpability’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• requiring applicants to show that the new evidence “ ‘undermine[s] the entire prosecution case and point[s] unerringly to innocence or reduced culpability’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• requiring applicants to show that the new evidence “ ‘undermine[s] the entire prosecution case and point[s] unerringly to innocence or reduced culpability’ ” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Hamilton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2014-01-15· cited 314×
• Jacob Lee Schmidt v. State of Iowa
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2018-03-23· cited 226×
• State v. Lotter
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2009-09-04· cited 120×
• In Re Lawley
  California Supreme Court· 2008-03-24· cited 43×
• Gould v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-07-19· cited 30×
• In re Richards
  California Supreme Court· 2012-12-03· cited 28×
• Engesser v. Young
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-11-12· cited 15×
• In re Miles
  California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-01-19· cited 1×
• In re Miles
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-01-19
• In re Miles
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-02-10
• David Palmer Dewberry v. State of Iowa
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2019-12-06