In Re Beechknoll Nursing Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• UST has no standing to seek modification of a plan by imposition of post-confirmation fees in cases where plan confirmed prior to amendment and substantially consummated
• The final decree does not adjudicate any rights between the parties and is more of an administrative step to allow the clerk’s office to dispose of the fully administered case file
• even if clarifying amendment and its legislative history state that quarterly fees should be paid by debtors with plans already confirmed, court found that amendment should not be applied retroactively
• amended § 1930 should not be applied to plan which was confirmed, substantially consummated, and fully administered prior to January 1996 because would impose new duties with respect to a completed transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).