Michigan Court of Appeals· 3/4/2010
In re Beck
Citations
- 287 Mich. App. 400
- 788 N.W.2d 697
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The fundamental requirements of procedural due process are notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before an impartial decision maker.”
- “The fundamental requirements of procedural due process are notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before an impartial decision maker.”
- “There are two types of due process: procedural and substantive.”
- “There are two types of due process: procedural and substantive.”
- “ ʻ[T]he essence of a substantive due process claim is the arbitrary deprivation of liberty or property interests.’ A person claiming a deprivation of substantive due process ‘must show that the action was so arbitrary (in the constitutional sense) as to shock the conscience.’ ”
- “ ʻ[T]he essence of a substantive due process claim is the arbitrary deprivation of liberty or property interests.’ A person claiming a deprivation of substantive due process ‘must show that the action was so arbitrary (in the constitutional sense) as to shock the conscience.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Davis, Hood, Servitto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re BeckMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-12-20· cited 70×
- Bonner v. City of BrightonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-12-04· cited 6×
- In re MorrisMichigan Court of Appeals· 2013-03-21· cited 5×
- Progressive Michigan Insurance v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-03-16· cited 3×
- in Re Beck MinorsMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-12-20
- Melissa Mays v. Governor Rick SnyderMichigan Supreme Court· 2020-07-29
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reed v. ReedMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17· cited 380×
- In Re JKMichigan Supreme Court· 2003-05-20· cited 296×
- Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-10-02· cited 160×
- Borowsky v. BorowskyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2007-04-11· cited 85×
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court· 1997-07-29· cited 61×
- By Lo Oil Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2005-09-02· cited 60×
- Laffin v. LaffinMichigan Court of Appeals· 2008-08-28· cited 57×
- McManamon v. Redford Charter TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals· 2006-12-05· cited 42×
- State v. FritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2002-06-12· cited 40×
- Evink v. EvinkMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-10-31· cited 29×
- In Re Adams EstateMichigan Court of Appeals· 2003-08-20· cited 26×
- Wilson v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-12-15· cited 9×
- In Re JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1985-05-08· cited 7×
- Minority Earth Movers, Inc. v. Walter Toebe Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-08-08· cited 6×
- Bradley v. FulghamMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-06-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.