In Re Beauty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• submission of chapter 13 plan with ostensible purpose of restructuring non-dis-chargeable debts from earlier chapter 7 case is contrary to the purpose of chapter 13 and thus not in good faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-07-06· cited 174×
• In Re Powers
  C.D. California· 1991-04-29· cited 41×
• In Re Russo
  N.D. Illinois· 1988-11-02· cited 21×
• Ekeke v. United States
  S.D. Illinois· 1991-10-03· cited 21×
• Southeast Bank, N.A. v. Jones (In Re Jones)
  N.D. Alabama· 1989-10-12· cited 14×
• Matter of Hagberg
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1988-10-12· cited 13×
• In Re Ramji
  S.D. Texas· 1993-05-24· cited 12×
• In Re Edwards
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1988-06-10· cited 10×
• In Re Aichler
  S.D. Texas· 1995-04-10· cited 9×
• In Re Hundley
  E.D. Virginia· 1989-03-24· cited 9×
• In Re Russell
  S.D. Texas· 2006-08-26· cited 9×
• Beauty, in Re
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-09-25

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Robinson
  D. Connecticut· 1982-03-23· cited 20×
• In Re Diego
  N.D. California· 1980-09-09· cited 16×
• In Re Sardella
  S.D. Ohio· 1981-01-07· cited 13×
• Matter of Troutman
  E.D. New York· 1981-05-22· cited 10×
• In Re Sanchez
  W.D. Texas· 1982-05-25· cited 8×