Skip to main content

In re B.D.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 224

Syllabus

Termination of parental rights child cannot be placed with either parent within a reasonable time or should not be placed with parents permanent custody in child's best interest motion to continue. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by denying father's request for a continuance of the trial. The trial had already been continued to allow father additional time to bond with the child. The juvenile court's judgment granting the agency permanent custody of the child was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. All of the court's findings under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1) were supported by clear and convincing evidence. Further, the court's best interest findings under R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) were supported by clear and convincing evidence.

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.