Supreme Court of Vermont· 1/8/1999
In re B.C.
Citations
- 726 A.2d 45
- 169 Vt. 1
- 1999 Vt. LEXIS 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
- recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
- recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
- recognizing that “CHINS and TPR proceedings are subject to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA)”
- recognizing that the court “did not improperly shift the burden of proof. . . .[by] noting the absence of any credible evidence that grandmother could assume the role of parent”
- noting that family court \possessed subject matter jurisdiction over the general type of controversy before it\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Johnson, Morse, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re C. P.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-07· cited 84×
- In re R.W. and N.W.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-11-18· cited 71×
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. Newstress International, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-08-31· cited 53×
- Lamell Lumber Corp. v. NEWSTRESS INTERN.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2007-08-31· cited 41×
- Bode v. Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2000-06-01· cited 33×
- In re D.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-21· cited 31×
- In re L.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-02-14· cited 30×
- In re D.T.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-10-29· cited 27×
- In re C.L.S., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont· 2020-01-10· cited 18×
- In re M.T.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-11-07· cited 12×
- OCS/Pappas v. O'Brien and Bernheim v. PappasSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-03-01· cited 10×
- In re E.W.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1999-01-25· cited 8×
- Sharond Hill v. Springfield Hospital and Emergency Services of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2023-04-21· cited 7×
- In re N.HSupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-09-28· cited 6×
- State v. Allan WashburnSupreme Court of Vermont· 2024-08-02· cited 6×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-08-31· cited 4×
- In re S.P.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2001-09-26· cited 3×
- In re L.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont· 2014-02-14· cited 2×
- Brace v. Vergennes Auto, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-05-22· cited 2×
- In re M.A.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-17· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Samuel Nemaizer, General Manager of the New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear and Allied Workers' Union I.L.G.W.U. v. Jack Baker, an IndividualSecond Circuit· 1986-06-05· cited 819×
- In Re DenioSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-03· cited 69×
- Williams v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-06-07· cited 52×
- Shute v. ShuteSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-03· cited 32×
- In re G. F.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1982-11-30· cited 31×
- Springfield Teachers Ass'n v. Springfield School DirectorsSupreme Court of Vermont· 1997-10-10· cited 28×
- Columb v. ColumbSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-09-17· cited 25×
- In re D.B.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-12-10· cited 24×
- Peloso v. BotkinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-06-08· cited 20×
- Boisvert v. BoisvertSupreme Court of Vermont· 1983-09-26· cited 16×
- Matthews v. RileySupreme Court of Vermont· 1994-07-22· cited 16×
- In re A.L.H.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-08· cited 16×
- In Re CifarelliSupreme Court of Vermont· 1992-04-03· cited 15×
- In re J.D.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-09-06· cited 10×
- Hansen v. HansenSupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-05-05· cited 8×
- In re B.J.C.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1988-01-08· cited 8×
- Cricenti v. WeilandMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1998-05-19· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.