In Re Battista

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that debtor had to establish that co-signed obligations “were incurred for her benefit as opposed to the benefit of the cosigner” in order to separately classify cosigned debt
• denying plan confirmation when debtor proposed to pay 100% on two unsecured co-signed debts while paying other unsecured creditors a 6% dividend

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named In Re Battista

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• In re Battista
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1939-12-19
• In re Battista
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1967-10-05