In re Bartholomew

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that “conversions and bad checks ... attributable to inadvertence and shoddy bookkeeping” did not violate D.R. 1-102(A)(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Fengling Liu
  Second Circuit· 2011-11-22· cited 16×
• In re Britton
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-07-24· cited 15×
• In re Chariff
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-11-08· cited 6×
• In re Orseck
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1999-06-22· cited 5×
• In re Bartholomew
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1996-12-30

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re Klugerman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-04-20· cited 12×
• In re Swyer
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-09-16· cited 4×
• In re Rothenberg
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1988-09-23· cited 4×
• In re Abbott
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-03-11· cited 4×