In Re Bartelini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a debtor’s decision to not commit Social Security benefits to pay unsecured creditors may be “considered as one of many factors under a totality of the circumstances inquiry to determine good faith”
• holding that a debtor’s decision to not commit Social Security benefits to pay unsecured creditors may be “considered as one of many factors under a totality of the circumstances inquiry to determine good faith”
• holding that debtors could not be compelled to include their Social Security income in their computation of disposable income or projected disposable income given § 101(10A)’s exclusion of Social Security income from the term “current monthly income”
• stating that, prior to BAPCPA, courts “consistently included social security income in the calculation of projected disposable income.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that, prior to BAPCPA, courts “consistently included social security income in the calculation of projected disposable income.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• stating that, prior to BAPCPA, courts “consistently included social security income in the calculation of projected disposable income.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).