In Re Barnes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling with little discussion that taking steps to reschedule and advertise a sheriff’s sale did not violate automatic stay
• Rescheduling and advertisement of a Sheriff’s sale three days after the dismissal of Chapter 13 petition is not violative of Bankruptcy Rule 7062. 1
• taking steps to reschedule and advertise a sheriffs sale of property did not violate the automatic stay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hart v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hart)
  D. Massachusetts· 2000-03-27· cited 25×
• Zeoli v. RIHT Mortgage Corp.
  D. New Hampshire· 1993-01-05· cited 24×
• Witkowski v. Knight (Witkowski)
  First Circuit· 2014-11-13· cited 18×
• In Re Fine
  D. Minnesota· 2002-11-21· cited 10×
• Rossi, McCreery & Assoc., Inc. v. Abbo (In Re Abbo)
  N.D. Ohio· 1996-01-19· cited 8×
• Perez v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. ex rel. Certificate Holders of Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2003-NC10
  First Circuit· 2016-09-28· cited 5×