In Re Bare Escentuals, Inc. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court “may take judicial notice of the existence of unrelated court documents . . . it will not take judicial notice of such documents for the truth of the matter asserted therein”
• explaining that 26 the court “may take judicial notice of the existence of unrelated court documents . . . it will not 27 take judicial notice of such documents for the truth of the matter asserted therein”
• explaining that the court 24 “may take judicial notice of the existence of unrelated court documents . . . it will not take judicial 25 notice of such documents for the truth of the matter asserted therein”
• granting defendants’ request to take judicial notice of SEC filings, but 22 specifying that they will not “where inappropriate” be considered for the truth of the 23 matter asserted
• in considering defendant’s motion to dismiss, court took judicial notice of existence of 5 unrelated court documents, but declined to take judicial notice of truth of matters set forth in these 6 documents
• “The court may take judicial notice of the existence of unrelated court documents, 8 although it will not take judicial notice of such documents for the truth of the matter 9 asserted therein.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).