Skip to main content

In Re Barber

Citations

  • 81 F.2d 231
  • 23 C.C.P.A. 834
  • 1936 CCPA LEXIS 38

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming double patenting rejection of design claim for a flashlight cap and hanger ring because of lack of patentable distinction between claimed design and earlier utility patent
  • affirming double patenting rejection of design claim for a flashlight cap and hanger ring because of lack of patentable distinction between claimed design and earlier utility patent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham, Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, Lenroot

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.