in Re Barbara Walker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court did not err when ignoring police interview transcripts on hearsay grounds
• noting that evidence that requires an “inferential leap” is not direct evidence of discrimination
• culpability under the third prong of the state-created danger doctrine “requires a showing of at least deliberate indifference”
• “[O]nce a party moves for summary judgment and identifies record materials showing no genuine dispute of material fact, the nonmoving party “must history. (Doc. 43-2 ¶¶ 1, 2.
• “Plaintiffs spend a single sentence objecting to this ruling. . . . Given this bare-bones briefing, plaintiffs forfeit their argument.” (citing Bard v. Brown County, 970 F.3d 738, 750 (6th Cir. 2020)). Sweatt has thus failed to show entitlement to relief under Rule 60(b
• “[W]e apply [the McDonnell Douglas test] to both statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).