In re Bank One Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that information about other claims was “not reasonably likely to lead to admissible information” about Hughes’ claim
• “Despite the split among the various courts elsewhere, all three decisions from this District that have considered the issue agree that Semien’s two-part test for authorizing conflict discovery no longer remains viable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).