Customs and Patent Appeals· 1/27/1936
In Re Ball
Citations
- 81 F.2d 242
- 23 C.C.P.A. 830
- 1936 CCPA LEXIS 37
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[I]nasmuch as the reasons of appeal do not include all of the grounds of rejection of the involved claims by the Examiner, . . . the decision of the Board of Appeals must be affirmed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graham, Bland, Hatfield, Garrett, Lenroot
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re WagenhorstCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1933-04-24· cited 23×
- In re LilienfeldCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1933-12-30· cited 7×
- In re EmanueliCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1933-12-04· cited 2×
- In re SponableCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1934-03-19· cited 2×
- In re TwissCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1934-12-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.