In re Baker
Citations
- 21 Wash. 259
- 57 P. 827
- 1899 Wash. LEXIS 272
Syllabus
<p>APPELLATE JURISDICTION-HABEAS CORPUS PROCEEDINGS.</p> <p>An appeal lies to the supreme court from a judgment remanding a prisoner on habeas corpus, under Bal. Code, § 6500, authorizing an appeal “in any action or proceeding,” and Bal. Code, § 5739, declaring that a judgment in a special proceeding is a final determination of the rights of the parties therein.</p> <p>HABEAS CORPUS-ISSUE IN EXTRADITION CASES.</p> <p>Whether a crime is substantially charged by an indictment of a foreign state is the question to be determined in habeas corpus proceedings in an extradition case, and not whether the indictment conforms to the technical rules of pleading under the laws of that state.</p> <p>'EXTRADITION-REQUISITION-NECESSITY OE SEAL.</p> <p>A prisoner will not be discharged in habeas corpus proceedings in an extradition ease, because the seal of the demanding •state was not attached to the governor’s requisition, where it was •otherwise correct in form and substance.</p>
Judges: Anders
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Honore v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesWashington Supreme Court· 1970-02-26· cited 45×
- Winnovich v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court· 1908-07-01· cited 24×
- Poulin v. BonenfantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1969-03-20· cited 12×
- In re RudebeckWashington Supreme Court· 1917-03-28· cited 10×
- Keller v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1963-03-04
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.