Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that companies \have a legitimate understandable motive to increase profits\ and that \[p]rofit is the essence of a capitalistic society\
• \Evidence of sporadic exchanges of shop talk among field representatives who lack pricing authority is insufficient to survive summary judgment.\
• “[E]videnee of social contacts and telephone calls among representative of the defendants was insufficient to exclude the possibility that the defendants acted independently.”
• “[E]vidence of social contacts and telephone calls among representatives of the defendants was insufficient to exclude the possibility that the defendants acted independently.”
• without a mechanism to detect conspirator cheating, no conspiracy could long endure
• referring to the - competitors’ “truce”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).