· 4/21/1998
In Re Baby Boy H. v. Sheila H.
Citations
- 63 Cal. App. 4th 470
- 63 Cal. App. 2d 470
- 73 Cal. Rptr. 2d 793
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3068
- 98 Daily Journal DAR 4179
- 1998 Cal. App. LEXIS 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that reunification services are a benefit to which there is no constitutional entitlement under due process principles
- finding that when reunification is excused, it is because “the Legislature recognizes that it may be fruitless to provide reunification services” and “offering services would be an unwise use of governmental resources”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.