In Re Azalea B.
Syllabus
In this case involving termination of the father's and mother's parental rights to two of their minor children, the trial court determined that three statutory grounds had been proven as to each parent by clear and convincing evidence. The trial court further determined that clear and convincing evidence demonstrated that termination of the father's and mother's parental rights was in the children's best interest. The father and mother have each appealed. Discerning no reversible error, we affirm.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that privileged communications are A immune from an action alleging defamation or invasion of privacy @
- reasoning that privileged communications are “immune from an action alleging defamation or invasion of privacy”
- ruling group of employees targeted by employer did “not possess discrete, insular and immutable characteristics” and, therefore, did not constitute a class for purposes of §1985(3)
- section protects classes characterized by “some inherited or immutable characteristic” or by “political beliefs or associations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.