In re A.Y.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 739
Syllabus
DELINQUENCY – DUE-PROCESS RIGHTS – SUFFICIENCY AND WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE – AGGRAVATED ROBBERY – OPERABILITY OF A FIREARM: Where the magistrate did not rely on juvenile's invocation of his right to remain silent as substantive evidence of guilt that he possessed an operable firearm, juvenile was not adjudicated delinquent in violation of his due-process rights. The state presented sufficient evidence that juvenile possessed an operable firearm where juvenile entered a store, pointed a weapon at the victim and demanded money, and the victim testified that he believed the weapon to be real.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-21· cited 9×
- In re D.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-29· cited 6×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.