In Re: A.W.H. Pet of: E.H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Celotex is the only case in conflict with conclusion that an asbestos-claims exception statute is not unconstitutional
• noting that Celotex is the only case in conflict with conclusion that an asbestos-claims exception statute is not unconstitutional
• upholding decision to treat asbestos-related claims differently from other latent-injury claims based on “the many factors which place asbestos-related injuries in a class by themselves” (citation omitted)
• discussing Tennessee's \asbestos\ and \silicon breast implant\ exceptions to the ten-year repose statute
• summary judgment was properly granted to manufacturers who had not distributed asbestos products within 10 years prior to enactment of Tennessee Products Liability Act establishing a 10-year statute of repose

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).