· 2/25/2009
In Re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices and Products
Citations
- 624 F. Supp. 2d 396
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The Court measures the adequacy of Plaintiffs' factual allegations and legal claims against the legal standards of California, the state where this action was originally filed.”
- Congress intended § 1441(b) to restrict federal jurisdiction and deemed defendants in cases involving a properly joined and served in-state defendant do not require access to the federal courts to avoid prejudice to out- of-state defendants
- Congress intended § 1441(b) to restrict federal jurisdiction and deemed defendants in cases involving a properly joined and served in-state defendant do not require access to the federal courts to avoid prejudice to out- of-state defendants
- Congress intended § 1441(b) to restrict federal jurisdiction and deemed defendants in cases involving a properly joined and served in-state defendant do not require access to the federal courts to avoid prejudice to out- of-state defendants
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rufe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.