Skip to main content
· 2/25/2009

In Re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices and Products

Citations

  • 624 F. Supp. 2d 396

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The Court measures the adequacy of Plaintiffs' factual allegations and legal claims against the legal standards of California, the state where this action was originally filed.”
  • Congress intended § 1441(b) to restrict federal jurisdiction and deemed defendants in cases involving a properly joined and served in-state defendant do not require access to the federal courts to avoid prejudice to out- of-state defendants
  • Congress intended § 1441(b) to restrict federal jurisdiction and deemed defendants in cases involving a properly joined and served in-state defendant do not require access to the federal courts to avoid prejudice to out- of-state defendants
  • Congress intended § 1441(b) to restrict federal jurisdiction and deemed defendants in cases involving a properly joined and served in-state defendant do not require access to the federal courts to avoid prejudice to out- of-state defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rufe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.