In re A.V.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that question of whether child was in need of care and supervision (\CHINS\
• holding that question of whether child was in need of care and supervision (“CHINS”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Kaela C.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-09-08· cited 49×
• Millis Public Schools v. M.P.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2018-02-06· cited 9×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re P.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1997-08-08· cited 66×
• In Re the Welfare of L.Z.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-11-21· cited 13×
• In re S.M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-04-01· cited 9×
• In Re SM
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2003-04-01· cited 6×
• In Re the Welfare of B.K.J.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-02-06· cited 3×