Skip to main content
· 1/21/2005

In Re Austin W.

Citations

  • 823 N.E.2d 572
  • 214 Ill. 2d 31
  • 291 Ill. Dec. 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding - 17 - “[t]he best-interests determination is then reviewed under the ‘manifest weight of the evidence’ standard”
  • recognizing that “once a child has been made a ward of the court and a dispositional order has been entered, the court may, at any time, vacate the original dispositional order and enter any other dispositional order that it could have initially entered”
  • question of \whether a change in circumstances warranting modification of the dispositional order has occurred\ is not justiciable because it was subsumed into the paramount issue—the best-interest inquiry
  • the child’s best interest is not part of an equation and may not be balanced against any other interest
  • GAL filed a petition to change custody

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMorrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.