Skip to main content
· 5/26/2000

In Re Ault

Citations

  • 728 N.E.2d 869
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 485
  • 2000 WL 680982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that attorney engaged in misconduct by filing the same claim in superior court after having been unsuccessful in small claims court and concluding that the subsequent suit was “res judicata because it was the exact claim litigated to conclusion in the small claims court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.