Skip to main content
· 5/27/2011

In Re Attorney Disciplinary Appeal

Citations

  • 650 F.3d 202
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10963
  • 2011 WL 2090822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a complainant lacks standing because his interest “results only from [his] status as a member of the public at large”
  • denying request to investigate or discipline two attorneys “because the alleged misconduct relate[d] primarily or exclusively to district court proceedings”
  • client 28 lacked standing to challenge decision not to discipline client’s 1 former attorney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Sack, Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.