· 5/27/2011
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Appeal
Citations
- 650 F.3d 202
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 10963
- 2011 WL 2090822
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a complainant lacks standing because his interest “results only from [his] status as a member of the public at large”
- denying request to investigate or discipline two attorneys “because the alleged misconduct relate[d] primarily or exclusively to district court proceedings”
- client 28 lacked standing to challenge decision not to discipline client’s 1 former attorney
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cabranes, Sack, Wesley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.