N.D. California· 3/24/2008
In Re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 554 F. Supp. 2d 1003
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22901
- 2008 WL 793876
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- opining that “any presumption against the granting of summary judgment in complex antitrust cases has now disappeared”
- opining that \any presumption against the granting of summary judgment in complex antitrust cases has now disappeared\
- finding that an agreement among banks concerning an ATM interchange fee should be governed by the rule of reason, not the per se rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Andrea Resnick v. Netflix, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2015-02-27· cited 58×
- In re WellPoint, Inc. Out-of-Network \UCR\ Rates LitigationC.D. California· 2011-08-11· cited 39×
- Med. Ctr. at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Atrium Health Sys.Sixth Circuit· 2019-04-25· cited 17×
- Amended June 5, 2015 Steven A. Mueller, Bradley J. Brown, Mark A. Kruse, Kevin D. Miller, and Larry E. Phipps, on Behalf of Themselves and Those Like Situated v. Wellmark, Inc. D/B/A Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa, an Iowa Corporation, and Wellmark Health Plan of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-02-27· cited 7×
- Winn Dixie Stores v. Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative IncThird Circuit· 2023-12-26· cited 6×
- Unnamed caseSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-02-27
- Winn Dixie Stores v. Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative IncThird Circuit· 2023-08-28
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court· 1970-06-01· cited 15,427×
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 2,575×
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-03-10· cited 1,658×
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court· 1984-06-19· cited 1,375×
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-04-25· cited 898×
- William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenNinth Circuit· 1995-06-22· cited 807×
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 776×
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 694×
- Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical SocietySupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 523×
- Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-06-28· cited 452×
- Northwest Wholesale Stationers, Inc. v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co.Supreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 435×
- Kendall v. Visa U.S.A., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-07· cited 357×
- Texaco Inc. v. DagherSupreme Court· 2006-02-28· cited 271×
- United States v. Joint Traffic Assn.Supreme Court· 1898-10-24· cited 248×
- Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 154×
Other cases named In Re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.