Skip to main content
· 10/5/2011

In Re Aspartame Antitrust Litigation

Citations

  • 817 F. Supp. 2d 608
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118226
  • 2011 WL 4793239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prevailing parties cannot “recover the costs of both transcripts and videotapes of depositions”
  • allowing “costs associated with hosting data” since “e- discovery saves costs overall by allowing discovery to be conducted in an efficient and cost- effective manner”
  • “The court is persuaded that in cases of this complexity, e-discovery saves costs overall by allowing discovery to be conducted in an efficient and cost-effective manner”
  • “Courts in the Third Circuit have routinely held that copying costs of $0.25/page . . . were reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Legrome D. Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.