In Re As

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding State can bring subsequent termination petitions because parental unfitness remains “open for future review”
• a trial court must be free to examine all of the circumstances, evidence, prior facts, prior orders, and other relevant information in order to arrive at a correct conclusion concerning parental fitness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re State in Interest of Jp
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-11· cited 26×
• People v. Elunder D.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-03-18· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Juvenile Appeal (83-De)
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1983-06-14· cited 133×
• In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Greisamer
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1976-10-14· cited 58×
• Lostutter v. Estate of Larkin
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1984-03-24· cited 55×
• In the Interest of A.S.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1988-03-31· cited 39×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Newman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-11-17· cited 34×
• In Re Interest of VB
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-05· cited 31×
• State v. Lowe
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1986-02-21· cited 29×
• In the Interest of J. G.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1987-03-26· cited 18×