In re A.S.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 680
Syllabus
Per Mayle, J., while the trial court erred when it failed to re-assign a Guardian ad Litem (\GAL\) after the original GAL withdrew one month prior to the permanency proceeding, it was not plain error given that the GAL filed a final report and recommendation in addition to the evidence supporting the termination decision. Additionally, father's right to cross-examine the GAL was not violated because he had the opportunity to cross-examine her and decided not to subpoena the former-GAL to testify.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re C.B.Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-06-22· cited 55×
- In re A.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-09-28· cited 30×
- In re B.E.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-14· cited 28×
- In re K.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-07· cited 11×
- In re L.R.-L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-22· cited 10×
- In re C.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-01-30· cited 10×
- In re S.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-25· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.