Skip to main content
· 12/29/2005

In Re Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 432 F.3d 507
  • 335 B.R. 507
  • 55 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 789
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 28897
  • 45 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 222
  • 2005 WL 3544810

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a denial of confirmation was a final order for purposes of appeal, in part, due to “practical considerations in the interests of judicial economy”
  • describing the codification of the absolute priority rule as one of the requirements of 1 129(b)
  • describing the codification of the absolute priority rule as one of the requirements of 1129(b)
  • applying the absolute priority rule to deny confirmation of a proposed plan
  • finality is construed more broadly in bankruptcy cases than in other civil cases; Third Circuit’s policy is to quickly resolve issues central to a bankruptcy case’s progress
  • “If the meaning is plain, we will make no further inquiry unless the literal application of the statute will end in a result that conflicts with Congress’s intentions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Fisher, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.