Skip to main content
· 7/18/1985

In Re Armco, Inc., at & T Technologies, Inc., Fmc Corporation, and International Business MacHines Corporation

Citations

  • 770 F.2d 103
  • 3 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 229
  • 15 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20774
  • 22 ERC (BNA) 2263
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21061
  • 22 ERC 2263

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that, under Rule 53, the \district court erred in granting the master authority to preside at trial on the merits of this case\
  • concluding that, under Rule 53, the “district court erred in granting the master authority to preside at trial on the merits of this case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heaney, Ross, Henley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.