Skip to main content
· 10/28/2003

In Re Ar Accessories Group, Incorporated, Debtor. Appeal Of: Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development

Citations

  • 345 F.3d 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the trial court’s belief that “the evidence was strong and conviction extremely likely” was an inappropriate basis to deny leave
  • addressing the “interest in property” provision as an alternative grounds for affirmance
  • describing lien as “a mechanism for ... enforcement of a preexisting right”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.