Skip to main content

In re A.R.

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 4378

Syllabus

Termination of parental rights; permanent custody; R.C. 2151.414; factors; best interest of the child; R.C. 3109.04; in-camera interview; guardian ad litem; wishes of the child; clear and convincing evidence; manifest weight of the evidence; compliance with case plan. The trial court did not err in failing to conduct an in-camera hearing with the child where the court was able to consider the child's wishes as conveyed by the guardian ad litem. The award of permanent custody to the agency was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.