Skip to main content
· 11/21/1989

In Re Applin

Citations

  • 108 B.R. 253
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 2146
  • 1989 WL 150292

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An inadvertent statement by counsel is more likely to be treated as an evidentiary admission ... [which is] mere evidence ... not conclusive, and may be contradicted by other evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christopher M. Klein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.