In Re Application of Mark W.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for purposes of admission- without-examination rule, work as a hearing examiner for a State agency “in a very limited field of law” was not practice of law
• holding that, for purposes of admission- without-examination rule, work as a hearing examiner for a State agency “in a very limited field of law” was not practice of law
• recognizing that in determining whether a state bar applicant’s activities constitute the “practice of law” ... “the more practical approach is to consider each state of facts and determine whether it falls within the fair intendment of the term”
• recognizing that in determining whether a state bar applicant's activities constitute the \practice of law\ . . . \the more practical approach is to consider each state of facts and determine whether it falls within the fair intendment of the term\
• refusing to adopt a precise definition of “practice of law,” and indicating that each case should be decided on its own facts
• \Numerous definitions of what constitutes practice of law are to be found.\ * * * \These definitions have arisen in a variety of circumstances.\ * * * \`[A]ttempts to define the practice of law have not been particularly successful'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).