Skip to main content
· 8/9/2002

In Re Appeals of Garen

Citations

  • 807 A.2d 448
  • 174 Vt. 151
  • 2002 Vt. LEXIS 221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because the Environmental Court is confined to the issues raised in the Statement of Questions, the rules governing pleading in traditional civil cases in that context have no applicability to Environmental Court cases
  • stating that issues on appeal to environmental court are limited to those identified in statement of questions filed in connection with notice of appeal
  • stating that issues on appeal to environmental court are limited to those identified in statement of questions filed in connection with notice of appeal
  • stating that issues on appeal to environmental court are limited to those identified in statement of questions filed in connection with notice of appeal
  • stating that a proper party to a proceeding will not be denied participation based solely on the withdrawal of an original appellant
  • noting that in Garen the Supreme Court concluded that “intervenors are permitted only to argue issues raised by a principal party”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.