In Re Appeal of Nevling

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where evidence is expressly considered and rejected, there is no capricious disregard of that evidence
• holding that “[w]hen considering an appeal from a local agency, a court’s standard of review is determined by the condition of the record created before that local agency”
• stating that “the opinion of a medical expert must be reviewed as a whole and inaccurate information will not render the opinion incompetent unless the opinion is dependent on those inaccuracies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).