Skip to main content
· 3/24/2008

In re Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board No. 07-PDB-038

Citations

  • 977 So. 2d 943
  • 2008 La. LEXIS 671
  • 2008 WL 1726349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parking lot owner owed reasonable duty to adequately light and monitor parking lot to nightclub patron who parked there
  • giving little weight to the fourth factor because “there are multiple ways in which our sister states handle the question of duty”
  • parking lot owner owed reasonable duty to ade- quately light and monitor parking lot to nightclub patron who parked there
  • “[i]mposing a duty of care is not . . . tantamount to imposing strict liability . . . because plaintiffs alleging negligence would still have to prove a breach of reasonable care in addition to causation”
  • reasonably foreseeable that assault would occur on premises given history of criminal activity in area
  • “The test for determining legal duty is a two-prong analysis that includes: (1) a determination of foreseeability; and (2) public policy analysis.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.