In re Appeal of Decision of the Disciplinary Board No. 07-PDB-010

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that § 31-51q “should not be construed so as to transform every dispute about working conditions into a constitutional question”
• stating that protected activity is activity that in “no way [has] to do with job performance, or on the job [occurrences], or interfer[ence] with . . . employment”
• holding the statute’s protections extend into the private workplace
• in ruling on motion to strike \the facts alleged in the plaintiff's complaint must be taken to be true\
• in ruling on motion to strike “the facts alleged in the plaintiffs complaint must be taken to be true”
• presumption that legislature has created consistent body of law warrants interpretation of statute that conforms with existing statutes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).