Skip to main content
· 8/25/2006

In re Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 2004-ADMIN-1047

Citations

  • 936 So. 2d 810
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 2324
  • 2006 WL 2598124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an action in contract has been recognized against an attorney and that it was error for the trial court to apply the tort statute of limitations to the plaintiff's claim in contract
  • construing identical language in § 8-132 and noting that court bears burden of giving notice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.