In re Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 05-PDB-144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, although statute imposed mandatory deadline for reviewing committee’s action, com- mittee’s failure to comply with that deadline did not deprive it of authority or require dismissal of complaint
• “[a] major change in legislative policy, we believe, would not have occurred without some sort of opposition or at least discussion in the legislature” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “ ‘[a] major change in legislative policy, we believe, would not have occurred without some sort of opposition or at least discussion in the legislature’ ”
• “[a] major change in legislative policy, we believe, would not have occurred without some sort of opposition or at least discussion in the legislature” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• failure to comply with a time requirement is not a jurisdictional defect absent a showing of prejudice
• ‘‘[i]n related circumstances, constitutional and statutory rights to speedy trials have been vindicated by a consid- eration of a matrix of factors including, most import- antly, prejudice’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).