Skip to main content
· 9/1/2006

In re Appeal of Decision of Disciplinary Board No. 05-PDB-125

Citations

  • 936 So. 2d 188
  • 2006 La. LEXIS 2376
  • 2006 WL 2553465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Connecticut legislature, in enacting CUTPA, could not have intended such an extraordinary alteration of the common law
  • court upholds judgment awarding damages for breach of contract and CUTPA violations in action involving contractor's refusal to honor agreement to award subcontract to plaintiff
  • defendant awarded a contract based on plaintiff's contractor's bid, and later awarded subcontract to another
  • Supreme court affirmed attorney's fees awarded by the trial court after the trial court found that a breach of a construction contract violated the second and third elements of the \cigarette rule.\
  • violation of contract to perform construction work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.