In Re Apollo Group Inc. Securities Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding expert was qualified to opine on a topic despite lack of 4 knowledge as to a particular specialty within his field because it was a “specific 5 objection[]”
• “Defendants’ specific objections concern matters that 8 go to the weight of the evidence and are appropriately addressed on cross-examination.”
• “[E]xpert testimony is inadmissible if it concerns factual issues within the 20 knowledge and experience of ordinary lay people, because it would not assist the trier of 21 fact in analyzing the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).