Skip to main content
· 3/22/2001

In Re APB Online, Inc.

Citations

  • 259 B.R. 812
  • 44 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 334
  • 45 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1515
  • 2001 Bankr. LEXIS 247
  • 2001 WL 290350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that courts “measure nomi-nality by comparing the option price to the ... fair market value at the time the option is exercised”
  • considering recharacterization as defense to lessor request for lease payments as administrative claim, presumably under Bankruptcy Code section 503 or section 365(d)(10)
  • declining to consider affidavit testimony because affiant did not “participate[] in the lease transactions or the computation of the option prices” and holding that the “record is insufficient to permit [the court] to conclude ... that the ... option price was or was not nominal”
  • Chapter 11 debtor and creditors' committee challenged true lease status by opposing lessor’s motion for allowance and payment of administrative expense claim
  • agreement permitting the lessor to execute a UCC financing statement evidence of a disguised security agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stuart M. Bernstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.