In re A.P.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 741
Syllabus
Juvenile court did not err when it granted PCC of appellant's child to the agency because clear and convincing evidence in the record established, pursuant to R.C. 2151.414.(B)(1)(a), the child could not be placed with appellant within a reasonable time or should not be placed with appellant, and appellant did not challenge the juvenile court's conclusion that PCC was in the best interest of the child. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Jamison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court· 1984-05-02· cited 893×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re E.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-04· cited 20×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-16· cited 12×
- In re N.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-22· cited 7×
- In re N.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-08· cited 7×
- In re I.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-07· cited 4×
- In re T.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-16· cited 4×
- In re A.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-01· cited 4×
- In re V.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-19· cited 2×
- In re L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-18· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.